The Investigator’s Dilemma - A Review of Social Media Analytics Research Ethics in Information Systems

Authors

  • Julian Marx University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Milad Mirbabaie Paderborn University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3287

Keywords:

Social Media Analytics, Ethics, Information Systems

Abstract

Social media have become not only integral parts of our private and professional lives, but also an indispensable source of data for empirical research across a variety of academic disciplines. Applying a Social Media Analytics (SMA) methodology, however, imposes heavy ethical challenges on researchers. Scholars in the Information Systems (IS) discipline must deal with a patchwork of ethical frameworks, regulations, and (missing) institutional support. To initiate a debate on how to develop a common understanding of SMA research ethics, this paper compiles a scoping review of extant literature and suggests a research agenda for IS scholarship on this matter. The review yields a total of eight fundamental principles of ethical SMA research, which provide a starting point to guiding individual researchers towards more ethical conduct. At the same time, this work unearths a multitude of intricate dilemmas that are currently unresolved. The findings of this review will encourage IS scholarship to find its own voice in the debate about social media research ethics.

References

research in cyberspace. Information Society, 12(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/713856146

Anderson, J., Casas Saez, G., Anderson, K., Palen, L., & Morss, R. (2019). Incorporating Context and Location Into Social Media Analysis: A Scalable, Cloud-Based Approach for More Powerful Data Science. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS), 2274–2283. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.275

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Bakardjieva, M., & Feenberg, A. (2000). Involving the virtual subject. Ethics and Information Technology, 2(1), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011454606534

Beier, M., & Wagner, K. (2016). Social Media Adoption : Barriers to the Strategic Use of Social Media. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 1–18.

Beninger, A. K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., Silvester, H., Beninger, K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., & Silvester, H. (2014). Research using social media; users’ views. NatCen Social Research.

Boell, S. K., & Wang, B. (2019). www.litbaskets.io, an IT Artifact Supporting Exploratory Literature Searches for Information Systems Research. Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), 663–673. https://www.acis2019.org/Papers/ACIS2019_PaperFIN_141.pdf

Brotsky, S. R., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “Pro-ana” community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 5(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter Hashtags from Ad Hoc to Calculated Publics. In Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks (pp. 13–28). https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1672-8

Carpenter, K. J., & Dittrich, D. (2011). Bridging the Distance: Removing the Technology Buffer and Seeking Consistent Ethical Analysis in Computer Security Research. In 1st International Digital Ethics Symposium. Loyola University Chicago Center for Digital Ethics and Policy.

Cohen, J. E. (2012). Configuring the networked self: Law, code, and the play of everyday practice. Yale University Press.

Conway, M. (2014). Ethical issues in using twitter for public health surveillance and research: Developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3617

Conway, M., & O’Connor, D. (2016). Social media, big data, and mental health: Current advances and ethical implications. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.004

Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. In Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446269114

Couldry, N., & Powell, A. (2014). Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data and Society, 1(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277

Crawford, K., & Finn, M. (2015). The limits of crisis data: analytical and ethical challenges of using social and mobile data to understand disasters. GeoJournal, 80(1), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9597-z

Curran, J., Fenton, N., & Freedman, D. (2012). Misunderstanding the internet. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203146484

danah boyd. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge.

Dijck, J. Van, & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding Social Media Logic. In Media and Communication (pp. 2–14). https://doi.org/10.12924/mac2013.01010002

Dubois, E., Gruzd, A., & Jacobson, J. (2020). Journalists’ Use of Social Media to Infer Public Opinion: The Citizens’ Perspective. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318791527

Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(1), 195–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186

Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103

Fiesler, C., Lampe, C., & Bruckman, A. S. (2016). Reality and perception of copyright terms of service for online content creation. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1450–1461. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819931

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media and Society, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Foot, P. (1983). Moral Realism and Moral Dilemma. The Journal of Philosophy, 80(7), 379–398.

Franz, D., Marsh, H. E., Chen, J. I., & Teo, A. R. (2019). Using facebook for qualitative research: A brief primer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/13544

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066

Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies (pp. 167–194). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes toward the ethics of research using social media: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Golder, S., Scantlebury, A., & Christmas, H. (2019). Understanding public attitudes toward researchers using social media for detecting and monitoring adverse events data: Multi methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.7081

Gruzd, A., Abul-Fottouh, D., & Mashatan, A. (2020). Who is Influencing the #GDPR Discussion on Twitter: Implications for Public Relations. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2619–2629. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2020.319

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “Ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Hair, N., & Clark, M. (2007). The ethical dilemmas and challenges of ethnographic research in electronic communities. International Journal of Market Research, 49(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530704900609

Heilferty, C. M. (2011). Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: A qualitative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(5), 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05563.x

Heimer, C. A., & Petty, J. (2010). Bureaucratic ethics: IRBS and the legal regulation of human subjects research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2013). Informed Consent, Big Data, and the Oxymoron of Research That Is Not Research. American Journal of Bioethics, 13(4), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.768864

Johnson, B. (2010). Privacy no longer a social norm, says Facebook founder. The Guardian.

Kaschesky, M., Sobkowicz, P., Lobato, J. M. H., Bouchard, G., Archambeau, C., Scharioth, N., Manchin, R., Gschwend, A., & Riedl, R. (2013). Bringing representativeness into social media monitoring and analysis. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2003–2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.120

Kennedy, H., Elgesem, D., & Miguel, C. (2017). On fairness: User perspectives on social media data mining. Convergence, 23(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592507

Kennedy, H., & Moss, G. (2015). Known or knowing publics? Social media data mining and the question of public agency. Big Data and Society, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715611145

Kerr, I. (2001). The Legal Relationship Between Online Service Providers and Users. Canadian Business Law Journal, 35, 1–40.

Levac, D., Colquhooun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(69), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/

cbo9780511814563.003

Libert, T. (2015). Privacy implications of health information seeking on the web. Communications of the ACM, 58(3), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658983

Lomborg, S., & Bechmann, A. (2014). Using APIs for Data Collection on Social Media. Information Society, 30(4), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.915276

Malsbender, A., Voigt, M., Beverungen, D., & Rosemann, M. (2013). Digital social signal processing - Theoretical underpinning and research agenda. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), 1–12.

Mavroudis, J., & Milne, E. (2016). Researching microcelebrity: Methods, access and labour. First Monday, 21(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i7.6401

Mayer, M., & Till, J. E. (1996). The Internet: A modern Pandora’s Box? Quality of Life Research, 5(1), 568–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439230

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. SSOAR. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173

Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2001). Synthesising research evidence. In Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services (pp. 1–33). Routledge.

Mikal, J., Hurst, S., & Conway, M. (2016). Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5

Mirbabaie, M., Bunker, D., Stieglitz, S., Marx, J., & Ehnis, C. (2020). Social Media in Times of Crisis: Learning from Hurricane Harvey for the COVID-19 Pandemic Response. Journal of Information Technology, 35(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220929258

Moreno, M. A., Fost, N. C., & Christakis, D. A. (2008). Research ethics in the MySpace era. Pediatrics, 121(1), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3015

Moreno, M. A., Grant, A., Kacvinsky, L., Moreno, P., & Fleming, M. (2012). Older adolescents’ views regarding participation in facebook research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.02.001

Nissenbaum, H. (2011). A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus, 140(4), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00113

Ohm, P. (2015). Sensitive information. Southern California Law Review, 88(5), 1125–1196.

Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2014). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & Mcewen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123

Randolph, J. J. (2005). Free-Marginal Multirater Kappa. Joensuu Learning and Instruction Symposium, 1–20.

Reuter, C., Hughes, A. L., & Kaufhold, M. A. (2018). Social Media in Crisis Management: An Evaluation and Analysis of Crisis Informatics Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(4), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1427832

Richter, D., Riemer, K., & vom Brocke, J. (2011). Internet Social Networking. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0151-y

Roberts, L. D. (2015). Ethical Issues in Conducting Qualitative Research in Online Communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008909

Rothstein, M. A., & Shoben, A. B. (2013). Does Consent Bias Research? American Journal of Bioethics, 13(4), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.767955

Shropshire, J. (2014). Extending the cloud with fog: Security challenges & opportunities. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 1–10.

Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Thiagarajan, R. (2008). Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline. Management Information Systems Quarterly (MISQ), 32(3), 467–482.

Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126(1), 1–24.

Stevinson, C., & Lawlor, D. A. (2004). Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: Added value or diminishing returns? Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 12(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.003

Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media - An Investigation of Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. An Investigation of Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS), 29(4), 217–248.

Stieglitz, Stefan, Dang-Xuan, L., Bruns, A., & Neuberger, C. (2014). Social Media Analytics: An Interdisciplinary Approach and Its Implications for Information Systems. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 56(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-014-0407-5

Stieglitz, Stefan, Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., & Neuberger, C. (2018). Social media analytics – Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. International Journal of Information Management, 39(10), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.002

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Swirsky, E. S., Hoop, J. G., & Labott, S. (2014). Using Social Media in Research: New Ethics for a New Meme? American Journal of Bioethics, 14(10), 60–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.948302

Trottier, D. (2012). Social media as surveillance: Rethinking visibility in a converging world. Routledge.

Vayena, E., Salathé, M., Madoff, L. C., & Brownstein, J. S. (2015). Ethical Challenges of Big Data in Public Health. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003904

Vitak, J., Proferes, N., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2017). Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617725200

Vitak, J., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2016). Beyond the Belmont principles: Ethical challenges, practices, and beliefs in the online data research community. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 941–953. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820078

vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2015). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03709

Yeung, D. (2018). Social media as a catalyst for policy action and social change for health and well-being: Viewpoint. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8508

Zafeiropoulou, S., Sarker, S., & Carlsson, S. A. (2015). What’s Trending in Social Media Analytics Area? A Retrospective. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 1–15.

Zeng, D., Chen, H., Lusch, R., & Li, S. H. (2010). Social media analytics and intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2010.151

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(1), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. J. (2014). A topology of twitter research: Disciplines, methods, and ethics. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0083

Downloads

Published

2022-07-02

How to Cite

Marx, J., & Mirbabaie, M. (2022). The Investigator’s Dilemma - A Review of Social Media Analytics Research Ethics in Information Systems. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 26. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3287

Issue

Vol. 26 (2022)

Section

Research on Applied Ethics

License

AJIS publishes open-access articles distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Non-Commercial and Attribution License which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and AJIS are credited. All other rights including granting permissions beyond those in the above license remain the property of the author(s).