The Role of Actors in Blockchain Adoption Decisions – An Innovation Translation Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4489Keywords:
Actors, Blockchain Adoption, Innovation Translation, Actor-Network Theory (ANT), Adoption DecisionAbstract
An overview of challenges around blockchain adoption has revealed that there is little understanding of the process of blockchain adoption decisions, including who needs to be involved and consulted at various stages. When systems are designed to intentionally protect privacy or to obscure actors, such as blockchain platforms, it can be challenging to identify them and to understand their roles. To do this we used an Innovation Translation approach from Actor-Network Theory (Latour, 2007) which looks at the roles of both human and non-human actors. To understand the interactions among the actors involved, multiple rounds of interviews were conducted with Blockchain experts, utilising the qualitative Delphi method. The findings of this study propose a framework that provides insight into the decision-process by exploring the actors involved and their roles as they implement strategies to adopt blockchain and to convince other actors. The outcomes will assist blockchain practitioners and researchers to have an understanding of pre-adoption decisions and stakeholder involvement. Organisations considering implementing blockchain will benefit from this research as they will know where to start, who to engage, and which stakeholders are needed during the decision-making process.
References
Ågerfalk, P. J., Fitzgerald, B., & Slaughter, S. A. (2009). Introduction to the Special Issue—Flexible and Distributed Information Systems Development: State of the Art and Research Challenges. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 317-328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0244
Allen, D. W., Berg, C., & Novak, M. (2018). Blockchain: an entangled political economy approach. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 33(2), 105-125. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3158805
Avella, J. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11(1), 305-321. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3561.
Awa, H. O., Ukoha, O., Eke, B. C. (2016). Adoption of emerging ICTs: The role of actors in a social network. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1259879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1259879
Bandura, A. (2001). Media Psychology. Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication, 3, 265-299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
Barnes III, B. W., & Xiao, B. (2019). Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Technology: An Ecosystem Perspective (2019). DIGIT 2019 Proceedings. 9.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2019/9
Berardi, U. (2013). Stakeholders’ Influence on the Adoption of Energy-Saving Technologies in Italian Homes. Energy Policy, 60, 520-530.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.074
Bessant, J., & Rush, H. (1995). Building Bridges for Innovation: The Role of Consultants in Technology Transfer. Research Policy, 24(1), 97-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Joshi, A. (2020). Blockchain in education management: present and future applications. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 1-17. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-07-2020-0102.
Bhatt, B., & Singh, A. (2020). Stakeholders’ Role in Distribution Loss Reduction Technology Adoption in the Indian Electricity Sector: An actor-oriented Approach. Energy Policy, 137, 111064. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111064
Bhatti, S. H., et al. (2021). Internal and External Antecedents of Open Innovation Adoption in IT Organisations: Insights from an Emerging Market. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1726-1744. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0457
Birke, F. M., & Knierim, A. (2020). ICT for Agriculture Extension: Actor-network Theory for Understanding the Establishment of Agricultural Knowledge Centers in South Wollo, Ethiopia. Information Technology for Development, 26(3), 591-606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1727826
Boerboom, L., & Ferretti, V. (2014). Actor-Network-Theory Perspective on a Forestry Decision Support System Design. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(sup1), 84-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.946960
Bowler, P. J. (1975). The changing meaning of "evolution". Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(1), 95-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709013
Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and Adapting the Delphi Method for Use in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1609406915621381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621381
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Britten, N. (2006). Qualitative interviews. In C. Pope & N. Mays, Qualitative Research in Health Care, (chapter 2, 12-20). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Blackwell.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750841.ch2
Caldarelli, A., Ferri, L., Ginesti, G., & Spanò, R. (2020). Understanding blockchain adoption in Italian firms. In R. Agrifoglio, R. Lamboglia, D. Manchini, & F. Ricciardi (Eds.), Digital Business Transformation: Organizing, Managing and Controlling in the Information Age (pp. 121-135). Springer: Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors macro-structure Reality and How Sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an integration of micro and macro-sociologies (pp. 277-303). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Callon, M., & Law, J. (1986). Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? The Science Studies Reader (pp. 196-223). London, UK: Routledge.
Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
Cavusoglu, H., Hu, N., Li, Y., & Ma, D. (2010). Information technology diffusion with influentials, imitators, and opponents. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 305-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270210
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Abrahall, R., & Kautz, K. (2006). Actor-Networks and the Production of IS Success and Failure. ACIS 2006 Proceedings, 9. http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2006/9
Chhina, S., Chadhar, M., Firmin, S., & Tatnall, A. (2021). Blockchain Adoption Framework Using Innovation Translation Approach-The preliminary study. ACIS 2021 Proceedings, 85. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2021/85/
Dadkhah, M., Rahimnia, F., & Filimonau, V. (2022). Evaluating the opportunities, challenges and risks of applying the blockchain technology in tourism: A Delphi study approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 13(5), 922-954. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-04-2021-0115
Dujak, D., & Sajter, D. (2019). Blockchain Applications in Supply Chain. In A. Kawa, &, A. Maryniak, (Eds.), SMART Supply Network (pp. 21-46). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91668-2_2
Eze, S. C., & Chinedu-Eze, V. C. (2018). Strategic roles of actors in emerging information communication technology (EICT) adoption in SMEs: Actor-network theory analysis. The Bottom Line, 31(2), 114-136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BL-09-2017-0029
Eze, S. C., & Duan, Y. (2016, July). The Role of Actors in the Adoption of Emerging ICT in SMEs: An Actor Network Theory Analysis. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations (ICISO) (pp.234-236), August 2016, Campinas, Brazil. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42102-5
Fletcher, A. J., & Marchildon, G. P. (2014). Using the Delphi method for qualitative, participatory action research in health leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300101
Forrest, J. F. (1991). Practitioners’ forum: Models of the process technological innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(4), 439-453.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329108524070
Galati, F. (2022). Blockchain Adoption in Supply Networks: A Social Capital Perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(7), 17-32.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2019-0448
Garrett Jr, R. P., & Neubaum, D. O. (2013). Top management support and Initial strategic assets: A dependency model for internal corporate venture performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 896-915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12036
Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=7c1FAAAAQBAJ
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hanafin, S. (2004). Review of Literature on the Delphi Technique. Dublin, Ireland: National Children’s Office, 1-51. Retrieved from:
Hofman, D., DuPont, Q., Walch, A., & Beschastnikh, I. (2021). Blockchain governance: De facto (x) or designed? In V.L. Lemieux & C. Feng (Eds.), Building Decentralized Trust: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Design of Blockchains and Distributed Ledgers (pp. 21-33). Cham, Switzerland, Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54414-0_2
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2019). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 10.
doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90
Jenkins, D. A., & Smith, T. E. (1994). Applying Delphi Methodology in Family Therapy Research. Contemporary Family Therapy, 16, 411-430.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197902
Kautz, K. (2021). Editorial for the Australasian Journal of Information Systems 2021. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 25.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v25i0.3853
Khayer, A., Talukdar, M. S., Bao, Y., & Hossain, M. N. 2020). Cloud computing adoption and its impact on SMEs’ performance for cloud supported operations: A dual-stage analytical approach. Technology in Society, 60, 101225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101225
Koteska, B., Karafiloski, E., & Mishev, A. (2017, September). Blockchain implementation quality challenges: a literature review. In Z. Budimac (Ed.), Proceedings of the SQAMIA 2017: 6th Workshop of Software Quality, Analysis, Monitoring, Improvement, and Applications, Belgrade, Serbia (Vol. 1938, pp. 8-8). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1938/paper-kot.pdf
Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107831
Kyratsis Y., Ahmad R., & Holmes A. (2021). Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts. BMJ Open 2012, 2(2). doi: https://10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000872
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/download/32543408/99631234-Science-in-Action-by-B-Latour.pdf.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Leiby, J. (2018). The role of consultants and management prestige in management control system adoption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 66, 1-13.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.003
Levis, D., Fontana, F., & Ughetto, E. (2021). A look into the future of blockchain technology. Plos one, 16(11), e0258995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258995
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr, R. J. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093
McBride, N. (2003). Actor-network theory and the adoption of mobile communications. Geography, 88(4), 266-276. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40573881
McMaster, T., Vidgen, R. T., & Wastell, D. G. (1997). Towards an understanding of technology in transition. Two conflicting theories. In K. Braa, & E. Monteiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Information Systems Research in Scandinavia, IRIS20 Conference, Hanko, Norway, August 9-12, 1997. University of Oslo, Norway
Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., & Hoven, D. (2012). Identifying key actors for technology adoption in higher education: A social network approach. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures, Proceedings ASCILITE (pp. 664-574). retrieved from: https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/Wellington12/2012/images/custom/mirriahi%2C_negin_-_identifying_key.pdf
Myers, M. D. (2019). Qualitative Research in Business and Management. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://digital.casalini.it/9781526418326
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from: https://assets.pubpub.org/d8wct41f/31611263538139.pdf.
Nasarre-Aznar, S.o (2018). Collaborative Housing and Blockchain. Administration, 66(2), 59-82. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3189050. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2018-0018
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
Palas, M. J. U., & Bunduchi, R. (2021). Exploring interpretations of blockchain's value in healthcare: a multi-stakeholder approach. Information, Technology & People, 34(2), 453-495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2019-0008
Peng, G., & Mu, J. (2011). Technology adoption in online social networks. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 133-145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00866.x
Penteado, T. M., Silva do Nascimento, A. C., , Dávila Corrêa, C., ... , Amanda Cristina Nunes Pacífico A. M. (2019). Among people and artifacts: Actor-Network Theory and the adoption of solar ice machines in the Brazilian Amazon. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.013
Pólvora, A., Nascimento, S., Lourenço, J. S. & Scapolo, F. (2020). Blockchain for industrial transformations: A forward-looking approach with multi-stakeholder engagement for policy advice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120091. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120091
Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
Qolizadeh, M. H., Esmaili, M., Ebrahim Pour, M., & Moradi, M. (2023). Strategic Analysis of Blockchain Technology to Facilitate the KYC for the Social Security Organization Costumers Based on Actor-Network Theory. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 9(1), 279-310. doi: 10.22091/STIM.2021.6920.1581
Rogers E., M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations: Modifications of a Model for Telecommunications. In M.-W. Stoetzer & A. Mahler (Eds.), Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation (The diffusion of Innovations in Telecommunications) (pp.25-38). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-79868-9_2
Rugeviciute, A., & Mehrpouya, A. (2019). Blockchain, a panacea for development accountability? A study of the barriers and enablers for blockchain's adoption by development aid organizations. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2, 15.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00015
Sangal, S., Nigam, A., & Bhutani, C. (2022). Conceptualizing the role of blockchain in omnichannel healthcare: a Delphi study. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74(5), 782-800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0230
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Sidorova, A. (2006). Understanding business process change failure: An actor-network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1), 51-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230102
Sarosa, S. (2012). Adoption of social media networks by Indonesian SME: A case study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 244-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00339-5
Saurabh, S., & Dey, K. (2021). Blockchain technology adoption, architecture, and sustainable agri-food supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124731
Schmidt, C. (2004). The Analysis of Semi-Structured Interviews. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 253-259). Hamburg, Germany: Rowohlt. Retrieved from:
https://www.academia.edu/download/54606836/__A_Companion_to_Qualitative_Research.pdf#page=268.
Seuwou, P., Banissi, E., Ubakanma, G., Sharif, M. S. & Healy, A. (2016). Actor-network theory as a framework to analyse technology acceptance model’s external variables: the case of autonomous vehicles. In H. Jahankhani, A. Carilie, ..., G. Sexton (Eds.), Global Security, Safety and Sustainability - The Security Challenges of the Connected World: 11th International Conference, ICGS3 2017, London, UK, January 18-20, 2017, (pp.305-320). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51064-4_24
Seyfried, M., Ansmann, M., & Pohlenz, P. (2019). Institutional isomorphism, entrepreneurship and effectiveness: the adoption and implementation of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany. Tertiary Education and Management, 25(2), 115-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09022-3
Skulmoski, G.J., Hartman, F.T., & Krahn, J., (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), pp.1-21. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111405/.
Sternberg, H. S., Hofmann, E., & Roeck, D. (2021). The struggle is real: insights from a supply chain blockchain case. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(1), 71-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12240
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2022). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625
Tanniru, M., Niu, J., Feng, C., Duque, C.G., Lu, C., & Krishnan, H., (2021). Incentives to Engage Blockchain and Ecosystem Actors. In V.L Lemieux, & C. Feng, (Eds.), Building Decentralized Trust: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Design of Blockchains and Distributed Ledgers (pp. 35-61). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54414-0_3
Tatnall, A. (2005). Actor-network Theory in Information Systems Research. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, First Edition (pp. 42-46). Hershey, PE, USA: IGI Global. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch009
Tatnall, A. (2009). Innovation Translation as a Research Approach to Theorising Information Systems Implementation. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 6(1), 64-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2009.022484
Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2002). Using actor-network theory to research the implementation of a BB portal for regional SMEs in Melbourne, Australia. In Proceddings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference - 'eReality: Constructing the eEconomy’, paper 46, Bled, Slovenia, University of Maribor. Retrieved from:
http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2002/46.
Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Blockchain and tourism. In Z. Xiang, M. Fuchs, U. Gretzel, & W. Hoepken (Eds.), Handbook of e-Tourism (pp. 1-21), Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05324-6_28-1
Unnithan, C., & Tatnall, A. (2014). Actor-Network Theory (ANT) based visualisation of socio-technical facets of RFID technology translation: an Australian hospital scenario. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation (IJANTTI), 6(1), 31-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijantti.2014010103
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Varma, J. R. (2019). Blockchain in Finance. Vikalpa, 44(1), 1–11.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919839897
Venkatesh, V. Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3375136. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Viriyasitavat, W., & Hoonsopon, D. (2019). Blockchain Characteristics and Consensus in Modern Business Processes. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 13, 32-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.07.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shipra Chhina, Mehmood Chadhar, Sally Firmin, Arthur Tatnall
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
AJIS publishes open-access articles distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Non-Commercial and Attribution License which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and AJIS are credited. All other rights including granting permissions beyond those in the above license remain the property of the author(s).
