Approaches and Models for Teaching Digital Ethics in Information Systems Courses – A Review of the Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4517Keywords:
information systems, digital ethics, education, pedagogical theories, moral theoriesAbstract
The value and importance of teaching Digital Ethics within Information Systems and ICT courses is widely recognized and stand-alone or integrated digital ethics units are broadly implemented across degree courses. However, how such courses should be taught and what content they should include is a little explored topic. Using a narrative literature review methodology, this paper reviews the pedagogical theories underpinning digital ethics courses discussed in the literature and outlines approaches that deploy standalone ethics units, integrated ethics teaching, and hybrid teaching approaches and the use of interdisciplinary models. The paper identifies the employment of, and emphasis given to various moral theories in digital ethics education. The paper then discusses how our findings relating to different pedagogical approaches, degree of integration of ethics teaching, the use of interdisciplinary models and use of moral theories—are related to each other. The discussion explores trends in approaches and models for teaching digital ethics highlighted in the review, and makes recommendations for further exploration and inquiry. It concludes that the effective teaching of digital ethics will likely involve a considered combination of approaches, models and techniques, which may also be tailored to the needs of different roles and industries.
References
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the Difference. http://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20
Papert.pdf
Ali, S., Williams, R., Payne, B., Park, H., & Breazeal, C. (2019). Constructionism, Ethics, and Creativity: Developing Primary and Middle School Artificial Intelligence Education. International Workshop on Education in Artificiation Intelligence K-12 (EDUAI ’19), USA. https://robots.media.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/08/Constructionism__Ethics__and_Creativity.pdf
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S. & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Rebidwells Integr Peer Rev, 4(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
Barabas, C., Doyle, C., Rubinovitz, J. B., & Dinakar, K. (2020). Studying up: Reorienting the Study of Algorithmic Fairness around Issues of Power. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* ’20, New York, NY, USA, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372859
Barnard, A., de Ridder, C., Pretorius, L., & Cohen, E. (2003). Integrating Computer Ethics into the Computing Curriculum: A Framework for Implementation. Proceedings of the 2003 InSITE Conference, 3, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.28945/2619
Bates, J., Cameron, D., Checco, A., Clough, P., Hopfgartner, F., Mazumdar, S., Sbaffi, L., Stordy, P., & de la Vega de León, A. (2020). Integrating FATE/Critical Data Studies into Data Science Curricula: Where Are We Going and How Do We Get There? Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* ’20, New York, NY, USA, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372832
Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ben-Ari, M. (2001). Constructivism in Computer Science Education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(1), 45–73. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8505
Bezuidenhout, L., & Ratti, E. (2021). What Does It Mean to Embed Ethics in Data Science? An Integrative Approach Based on Microethics and Virtues. AI & Society, 36(3), 939–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01112-w
Bidwell, N. (2010). Ubuntu in the network: humanness in social capital in rural Africa. Interactions, 17(2), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699791
Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., & Shulner-Tal, A. (2021). Educating Software and AI Stakeholders about Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability, Transparency and Ethics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, 808-833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00248-0
Borenstein, J., & Howard, A. (2021). Emerging Challenges in AI and the Need for AI Ethics Education. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00002-7
Bradley, A. (2008). Accreditation Criteria Guidelines. No. G02, Engineers Australia Accreditation Board. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/content-files/2016-12/G02_Accreditation_Criteria_Guidelines.pdf
Briggle, A., Holbrook, J. B., Oppong, J., Hoffmann, J., Larsen, E. K., & Pluscht, P. (2016). Research Ethics Education in the STEM Disciplines: The Promises and Challenges of a Gaming Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9624-6
Buchanan, R. (2019). Digital Ethical Dilemmas in Teaching. In Peters, M.A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Singapore: Springer nature Singapore.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_150-1
Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., & Mattei, N. (2018) How to Teach Computer Ethics through Science Fiction.’ Communications of the ACM, 61(8), 54-84.
Bynum, T. (2015). Computer and Information Ethics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition).
https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/sum2019/entries/ethics-computer/
Califf, M. E., & Goodwin, M. (2005). Effective Incorporation of Ethics into Courses That Focus on Programming. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’05. New York, NY, USA, 347–351.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047464
Carter, L., & Crockett, C. (2019). An Ethics Curriculum for CS with Flexibility and Continuity. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, Cincinnati, OH, USA, October 16-19, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028356
Chatila, R., & Havens, J. C. (2019). The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. Robotics and Well-Being. International Series on Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, 95, 11–16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_2
Civaner M.M., Uncu, Y., Bulut, F., Giounous Chalil, E., & Tatli, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Needs Assessment. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 772–780.
Crisp, R., & Slote, M. A. (Eds.) (1997). Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Publishing Group.
Farooqui, J., Dawod, S., & Sarma, D. (2021). Towards a Neuroethical Ethos: A Case Study in Reframing Neuroethics Education for Engineers and Researchers. The Neuroethics Blog, Emory Center for Ethics. Accessed January 24, 2022.
http://www.theneuroethicsblog.com/2021/02/towards-neuroethical-ethos-case-study.html
Floridi, L., Cath, C., & Taddeo, M. (2019). Digital Ethics: Its Nature and Scope. The 2018 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17152-0_2
García-Avilés, J.A. (2014). Online Newsrooms as Communities of Practice: Exploring Digital Journalists’ Applied Ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29(4), 258-272.
Goldingay, S. & Boddy, J. (2017). Preparing Social Work Graduates for Digital Practice: Ethical Pedagogies for Effective Learning. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 209–220.
Goldsmith, J., & Burton, E. (2017). Why Teaching Ethics to AI Practitioners Is Important. Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4836-4840.
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11139
Graham, M. (1999). Some Thoughts about the Philosophical Underpinnings of Aboriginal Worldviews. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 3(2), 105–118.
https://doi.org/10.1163/156853599x00090
Greenhalgh T., Thorne S., & Malterud K (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6). https://doi: 10.1111/eci.12931
Grosz, B. J., Grant, D. G., Vredenburgh, K., Behrends, J., Hu, L., Simmons, A., & Waldo, J. (2019). Embedded EthiCS. Communications of the ACM, 62(8), 54–61.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3330794
Hagendorff, T.(2020). The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Hämäläinen, J. (2012). Pedagogic Theories. Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0015
Hassan, N. R., Mingers, J., & Stahl, B. (2018). Philosophy and Information Systems: Where Are We and Where Should We Go. European Journal of Information Systems: An Official Journal of the Operational Research Society, 27(3), 263–277.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2018.1470776
Herkert, J. (2004). Microethics, Macroethics, and Professional Engineering Societies. Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering: Papers from a Workshop. National Academy of Engineering. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/11083
Hildt, E., Laas, K., Miller, C., Taylor, S., & Brey, E. M. (2019). Empowering Graduate Students to Address Ethics in Research Environments. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics: CQ: The International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees, 28(3), 542-550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318011900046X
Huff, C., & Martin, C. D. (1995). Computing Consequences. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/219663.219687
Johnson, D. G. (1985). Computer Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Jones, S. (2016). Doing the Right Thing: Computer Ethics Pedagogy Revisited. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, 14(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-07-2014-0033
Katznelson, G. & Gerke, S. (2021). The Need for Health AI Ethics in Medical School Education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(4), 1447–1458.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row.
Kordzadeh, N. & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022). Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212
Lewis, A., & Stoyanovich, J. (2021). Teaching Responsible Data Science: Charting New Pedagogical Territory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 783-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7
Li, J., & Fu, S. (2012). A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8
Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). A Multi-Level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-Technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6.
Mason, R. O. (1986). Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/248873
Montréal Declaration for a Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence (2018). https://montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/
Moor, J. H. (1985). What Is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16(4), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x
Moriarty, J. (2021). Business Ethics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/ethics-business/
Müller, V. C. (2020). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/ethics-ai/
Mumford, E. (1995). Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS Approach. London, UK: Macmillan.
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Waples, E. P., & Devenport, L. D. (2008). A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior, 18(4), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420802487815
National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 2014. Emerging and Readily Available Technologies and National Security: A Framework for Addressing Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/18512
Newberry, B. (2004). The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 343–351.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY, USA: Broadway Books.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms, London, UK: Basic Books.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In Papert, S., & Harel, I. (Eds.), Constructionism. New York, NY, USA: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Plemmons, D. K., Baranski, E. N., Harp, K., Lo, D. D., Soderberg, C. K., Errington, T. M., Nosek, B. A., & Esterling, K. M. (2020). A Randomized Trial of a Lab-Embedded Discourse Intervention to Improve Research Ethics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(3), 1389–1394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917848117
Quinn, T.P. & Coghlan, S. (2021) Readying Medical Students for Medical AI: The Need to Embed AI Ethics Education (No arXiv:2109.02866, arXiv, 7 September 2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02866
Rest, J. R., Darcia, N. ez, Thoma, S. J., Bebeau, M. J.. (1999). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Milton Park, UK: Psychology Press (Routledge).
Richards, D., Formosa, P., Ryan, M., Hitchens, M., & McEwan, M. (2020). A Proposed AI-Enhanced Serious Game for Cybersecurity Ethics Training. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australian Institute of Computer Ethics (AiCE 2020), 1–9.
Singer, P. (Ed.). (2013). A Companion to Ethics (1st ed.), Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. London, UK: Blackwell.
Skirpan, M., Beard, N., Bhaduri, S., Fiesler, C., & Yeh, T. (2018). Ethics Education in Context. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 940–945. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159573
Someh, I., Davern, M., Breidbach, C. F., & Shanks, G. (2019). Ethical Issues in Big Data Analytics: A Stakeholder Perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44, Article 34, 718–747. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04434
Sprague, A. P., & Diaz-Sprague, R. (2019). Tying Ethics to Teamwork Training in a Minimodule. Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference, CSERC ’19, New York, NY, USA, 120–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375275
Towell, E., Thompson, J. B., & McFadden, K. L. (2004). Introducing and Developing Professional Standards in the Information Systems Curriculum. Ethics and Information Technology 6(4), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-005-5985-x
Tubig, P., & McCusker, D. (2021). Fostering the Trustworthiness of Researchers: SPECS and the Role of Ethical Reflexivity in Novel Neurotechnology Research. Research Ethics, 17(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120952500
Tucker, A. B. (1991). Computing Curricula 1991. Communications of the ACM, 34(6), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/103701.103710.
Véliz, C. (ed.). (2021). The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.001.0001
Weidener, L. & Fischer, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Teaching as Part of Medical Education: Qualitative Analysis of Expert Interviews. JMIR Medical Education, 9, Article e46428. DOI: 10.2196/46428
Wong, P. H. (2012). Dao, harmony and personhood: Towards a Confucian ethics of technology. Philosophy & Technology, 25, 6786.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Minna Paltiel, Marc Cheong, Simon Coghlan, Reeva Lederman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
AJIS publishes open-access articles distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Non-Commercial and Attribution License which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and AJIS are credited. All other rights including granting permissions beyond those in the above license remain the property of the author(s).
