Being Creative with a Non-Human: The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v29.5857Keywords:
Creativity, Art, text-to-image generative AI, technology platforms, Human-AI Collaboration, Autoethnographic Study, Design PrinciplesAbstract
What does it mean to be creative with generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in producing images in visual art and design? An overview is given of saliant prior work on human creativity, machine creativity, human-machine creativity, technology affordances and ethical issues. The author then reports an autoethnographic study of a seven-month project to produce artworks as part of a group project for an exhibition at a regional gallery, including her experimentation with different ways of using image generative-AI (image-GenAI). Insights from the author’s experiences are combined with relevant prior literature to develop guiding principles for assisting creative endeavours in this context. The set of principles, termed ORCA/E for AI-Art, comprise: (1) Openness to alternative perspectives; (2) Reflection and reflexivity; (3) Common communication framework; (4) Affordance-based design; and (5) Ethical and legal concern. Appropriate mechanisms for the principles are identified. The study responds to calls for research in the field of creative human-AI collaboration, which is a fast-changing and important field. The study contributes by adding to the limited number of first-hand accounts of the use of image-GenAI and by proposing guiding principles that address new ways of working creatively with this technology.
References
AIArtists (2025). Timeline of AI Art. https://www.aiartists.org
Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373-395.
Arts Law Centre of Australia (2025). https://www.artslaw.com.au
Attri, S. (2023). Can Artists Dream of AI-Assisted Art. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/can-artists-dream-ai-assisted-art-shalu-attri-3oxic/
Audry, S. (2021). Art in the Age of Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204.
Benbya, H., Strich, F. and Tamm, T. (2024) Navigating Generative Artificial Intelligence Promises and Perils for Knowledge and Creative Work. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 23-36.
Bendel, O. (2023). Image synthesis from an ethical perspective. AI & Society, 1-10.
Benjamin, W. (2018). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In A Museum Studies Approach to Heritage (pp. 226-243). Routledge.
Boo, C., Kim, Y., & Suh, A. (2025). A Collaborative Creative Process in the Age of AI: A Comparative Analysis of Machine and Human Creativity. Proceedings of the 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & McLean, J. F. (2010). Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), 2355-2368.
Canaday, J. (1980). What is Art? An Introduction to Painting, Sculpture and Architecture. London: Alfred A Knopf.
Caramiaux, B., & Fdili Alaoui, S. (2022). Explorers of Unknown Planets" Practices and Politics of Artificial Intelligence in Visual Arts. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (CSCW2), 1-24.
Cavanagh, P. (2021). The language of vision. Perception, 50(3), 195-215.
Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 18(2), 1-22.
Che, J., Sun, X., Gallardo, V., & Nadal, M. (2018). Cross-cultural empirical aesthetics. Progress in Brain Research, 237, 77-103.
Cooper, R., & Lilyea, B. (2022). I’m interested in autoethnography, but how do I do it. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 197-208.
Council of Europe (COE) (2024). The Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence
Craiyon (2025). Retrieved February 19, 2025, from https://craiyon.com
Edwards, K. (2023, July 6). Why Does All AI Art Look Like That? Medium https://medium.com/@keithkisser/why-does-all-ai-art-look-like-that-f74e2a9e1c87
Feingold, F. (2022). Artificial intelligence image generators bring delight and concern. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/10/ai-artist-systems-bring-delight-and-concern/
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goldkuhl, G. (2004). Design theories in information systems-a need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(2), 7.
Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., & Seidel, S. (2020). Research perspectives: the anatomy of a design principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6), 2.
Gregor, S., Müller, O., & Seidel, S. (2013, June). Reflection, Abstraction And Theorizing In Design And Development Research. In ECIS (Vol. 13, p. 74).
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
Hoffman, B. (2024). First Came “Spam.” Now, With AI, We’ve Got “Slop.”. The New York Times, 11.
Holzner, N., Maier, S., & Feuerriegel, S. (2025). Generative AI and Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17241.
Ideogram (2025). https//https://docs.ideogram.ai/
Jeffries, S. (2017). Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School. Verso Books.
Kaltenhauser, A., Stefanidi, E., & Schöning, J. (2024, May). Playing with perspectives and unveiling the autoethnographic kaleidoscope in HCI–A literature review of autoethnographies. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-20).
Kawakami, R., & Venkatagiri, S. (2024, June). The impact of generative AI on artists. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 79-82).
Ko, H. K., Park, G., Jeon, H., Jo, J., Kim, J., & Seo, J. (2023, March). Large-scale text-to-image generation models for visual artists’ creative works. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 919-933).
Kurzweil, R., Richter, R., Kurzweil, R., & Schneider, M. L. (1990). The Age of Intelligent Machines (Vol. 579). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lee, K., Cooper, A. F., & Grimmelmann, J. (2024, March). Talkin''Bout AI Generation: Copyright and the Generative-AI Supply Chain (The Short Version). In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science and Law (pp. 48-63).
Lovato, J., Zimmerman, J. W., Smith, I., Dodds, P., & Karson, J. L. (2024, October). Foregrounding artist opinions: A survey study on transparency, ownership, and fairness in AI generative art. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Vol. 7, pp. 905-916).
Luttrell, W. (2019). Reflexive qualitative research. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Maedche, A., Gregor, S., Morana, S., & Feine, J. (2019, April). Conceptualization of the problem space in design science research. In International conference on design science research in information systems and technology (pp. 18-31). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Mahdavi Goloujeh, A., Sullivan, A., & Magerko, B. (2024). Is It AI or Is It Me? Understanding Users’ Prompt Journey with Text-to-Image Generative AI Tools. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May (pp. 1-13).
Mamykina, L., Candy, L., and Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 96-99.
Manovich, L., & Arielli, E. (2021). Artificial aesthetics. https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/artificial-aesthetics
Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts, 8, 26.
McCormack, J., Cruz Gambardella, C., Rajcic, N., Krol, S. J., Llano, M. T., & Yang, M. (2023, April). Is writing prompts really making art?. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (Part of EvoStar) (pp. 196-211). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
McCormack, J., Llano, M. T., Krol, S. J., & Rajcic, N. (2024, March). No Longer Trending on Artstation: Prompt Analysis of Generative AI Art. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (Part of EvoStar) (pp. 279-295). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Meisner, G. (2018). The Golden Ratio The Divine Beauty of Mathematics. New York, NY: Quarto Group.
National Association for the Visual Arts (NAVA) (2025). https://www.visualarts.net.au
Nobel Prize (2025). https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/press-release/
Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.
Oates, B. J. (2006). New frontiers for information systems research: computer art as an information system. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 617-626.
OpenAI (2025) Developers platform. https://www.openai.com/api/
Oppenlaender, J. (2022, November). The creativity of text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 192-202).
Oppenlaender, J. (2024). A taxonomy of prompt modifiers for text-to-image generation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(15), 3763-3776.
Porter, B., & Grippa, F. (2020). A platform for AI-enabled real-time feedback to promote digital collaboration. Sustainability, 12(24), 10243.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Riaz, A., Gregor, S., & Lin, A. (2018). Biophilia and biophobia in website design: Improving internet information dissemination. Information & Management, 55(2), 199-214.
Richter, A. & Schwabe, G. (2025). There is No ‘AI’ in ‘TEAM’! Or is there? – Towards meaningful human-AI collaboration. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 29. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v29.5753
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18-24.
Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence a Modern Approach. (3rd edn.). Essex, England: Pearson.
Samuelson, P. (2023). Generative AI meets copyright. Science, 381(6654), 158-161.
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Schuhmann, C. (2022). LAION Aesthetics. https://laion.ai/blog/laion-aesthetics/
Schuhmann, C., Beaumont, R., Vencu, R., Gordon, C., Wightman, R., Cherti, M., ... & Jitsev, J. (2022). Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 25278-25294.
Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., De Vreede, T., De Vreede, G. J., Elkins, A., ... & Söllner, M. (2020). Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information & Management, 57(2), 103174.
Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 37-56.
Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-centred AI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stable Diffusion Online (2025). https://stablediffusionweb.com
Sun, R., Gregor, S., & Fielt, E. (2021). Generativity and the paradox of stability and flexibility in a platform architecture: A case of the Oracle Cloud Platform. Information & Management, 58(8), 103548.
Tang, Y., Zhang, N., Ciancia, M., & Wang, Z. (2024, November). Exploring the Impact of AI-generated Image Tools on Professional and Non-professional Users in the Art and Design Fields. In Companion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 451-458).
Tate Modern (2025). Art Terms. https://www.tate.org.uk >art >art-terms
Tuunanen, T., Winter, R., & Vom Brocke, J. (2024). Dealing with complexity in design science research: a methodology using design echelons. MIS Quarterly, (2).
Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2017). Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. In The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (pp. 232-245). Routledge.
Wang, P., Zhang, L. Y., Tzachor, A., & Chen, W. Q. (2024). E-waste challenges of generative artificial intelligence. Nature Computational Science, 1-6.
Weir, E., Leonards, U., & Roudaut, A. (2025, April). " You Can Fool Me, You Can’t Fool Her!": Autoethnographic Insights from Equine-Assisted Interventions to Inform Therapeutic Robot Design. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-20).
Wicky, B. I. M., Milles, L. F., Courbet, A., Ragotte, R. J., Dauparas, J., Kinfu, E., ... & Baker, D. (2022). Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies. Science, 378(6615), 56-61.
Wu, T. et al. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122-1136.
Zhang, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, M., & Kweon, I. S. (2023). Text-to-image diffusion models in generative ai: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07909.
Zittrain, J. (2006). The Generative Internet, Harvard Law Review, 119, 1974–2040. https://doi.org/10.1145/1435417.1435426.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shirley Gregor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
AJIS publishes open-access articles distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Non-Commercial and Attribution License which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and AJIS are credited. All other rights including granting permissions beyond those in the above license remain the property of the author(s).
